how
i.
what if I’d been sleeping easter, like a clock unwound,
all beliefs washed from stones, then with breath awoke
once more, what would I see? what would I say?
this room isn’t bare. someone lives in here.
ii.
a broken balsa wood glider plane. sitting on the front door threshold of our old
family house, a great gasp of wooden frame, then heard something crunch, it was the model plane that sat too close to me, crushed ruined destroyed, made flat.
I cried.
I have believed in pain, in regret. these being things that live past the moment of their own time, and because I carry them, or like measured glue, they are a part of who we pretend, a person where things break. meaning I am broken too.
that’s the myth, the lie of doing me.
I see tall blue. I see horizon’s line. neither ever ends. good heart that seems to imply. yet translations still lie to me.
I believe in atoms, in molecules, in chemistry, electricity, even though I can see nothing of them I understand. but still, seems like a good idea. just don’t get too attached. things change, then change again.
I could be wrong.
iii.
here’s the dope. a perfect party, god in heaven, pie’s in the oven and stars shimmer above seas of doubt but on the whole it all resolves into a big wide grin, all except one dire spot. in all the universe, exception’s rule, Houdini-like, crow’s feet on the wire standing aghast of every breath of gravity. one dull spot immune from right, a regular blight but being polite.
damn!
here’s the thing. when you’re naked in the morning, who’s gonna love you then?
when the oatmeal still isn’t made. when all your flaws are on the plate, old dishrags you kept, just because you remember when. will a smile score the dawn?
here’s the twist. shyness is a lie. pretense to dominate from across the room, sight unseen! yet every boat leaves a wake no matter how brief.
fish come following bait.
iv.
yet full to the brim, I won’t tolerate, can’t stand any measure of angst. not in what I read, but even more to point, in what I allow my pen to collect. there’s some thunder, some lightning in that I suppose because there is some angst within.
I’m not nice to it, not even polite!
but see, oh can you see, how could you miss? the sizzle of drama just trying my lips to shape the word – no – you’re not welcome to settle in here.
be on your way. blessings pressed on lips.
v.
see the clouds dressed in fish. collaborate unspoken fins.
two thoughts like ropes calculate then define perspective miles.
vi.
seven days to make a world.
three fingers more than necessary.
just a splash on the wall of thought, one drop of blood becoming diffuse.
the river starts, life begins. yet was there when nothing had nothing to say.
a poem that desires faith.
vii.
what if I was born as a bear? ate my meals with teeth and paws tearing ripping rending apart delicious bleeding heart warm on the tongue eating fire. not every day but so often as possible. more miles to pace.
does anyone of us dream of being born as food? what’s that suggest to you?
what will I be?
neil reid © june 2011
commentary:
Draft or drafty, I’m not sure. Like something that wants to be much more than it yet is. But, so be it. And a play given rein to be more of nature a prose poem. So be it too. Beliefs, that’s some task to take a looking at, and here, only bare begun, just bones this far. Important in knowing how to get across a busy street, but otherwise held lightly, as they are and not more. I’ll take this one as a first shot across the bow. Ripe for revisiting!
Say! Do doubts count towards beliefs? I got those too!
I loved working through this. It will be such fun for you to revisit and play with. I love the bear stanza, in particular and had to go back and reread it, as I wrote about it. Plenty of wonderful language throughout.
Aren’t doubts just another form of belief, or belief in reverse…
margo
Aren’t you swift! Barely time to shake the dust off my pen. And time it had to gather dust, near two weeks I’ve been playing with this Frankenstein (and suppose part that’s why the poem is the way it is). Now “how’s that” is a question I ask. More octopus than eagle eye! (Really really, I gotta start writing more brief.) But also suppose it puts some furrows in the back forty, so alright.
Yes, for me too, the bear stanza excites me the most. Thanks Margo, your kindly response much appreciated. ~neil
I love that it’s rambly. It’s engaging as thoughts are on belief and faith and erm, eating. Suppose the last stanza makes me think about tongues of fire which is about the Holy Spirit coming upon Jesus’s disciples on Pentecost. How they received faith and aren’t afraid. How they made believers and the church. So believing is powerful. How I go on.
Good measure to me Irene that you like it being rambly. (being as I don’t yet have it any other way to say!) I trust that we are able to understand more than we think possible. I trust that free association of thoughts and images are valid, whether or not I immediately understand in a literal way. Lots of my writing has something of this engagement within, leaping from stone to stone.
I tend to want to allow “mind” to worry about associations (more than make symbols of them by necessity). For me the bear is just a bear (well… ), but something raw, something honest (maybe like the poem is finally really getting ready to begin).
Thanks Irene. I take much comfort in your encouragement. ~neil
‘How’ I followed you all the way through iv. Then you lost me a bit, but no matter. If the writing’s good, I’ll follow through thick and thin.
Thanks for being such a good trooper Viv! 🙂 Yea, like a steam of consciousness thing, although perhaps this is more a “stumbling of consciousness”! It’s still an unwieldy topic for me – and it shows – and maybe that (for now) is part of the statement too.
And if you haven’t guessed by now, I’m rather willing to allow for free association. I figure that some thoughts/feelings know better than me! (the semi-conscious part!) AND you’re a dear for “following”. ~neil
Neil, it was fun to read. I like your play of language – “blight” and “polite” – the way you take rhyming words but contrast them just so. And the structure of part three – dope, thing, twist. I have to come back and read it again. And the thoughts of belief – science and faith – and doubt too. No, this room is certainly not bare. Thanks.
Richard
Thank you RIchard. Sometimes more of a poem comes into light after it is written (and let go). Sometimes more becomes visible after others touch the threads within a poem. Poems I think exist in relationship (all relationships). Thanks for spending some time with this admittedly first-step-sort-of-a-poem.
Part of what fills this room is community, is us. Thanks.
~neil
Neil, wonderful use of language. I am particularly fond of the bear stanza. You may think it drafty, I think it’s marvelous.
Pamela
You’re very sweet, and very appreciated Pamela.
Sometimes I near think the whole poem was waiting to get to the bear. Then the bear arrives. Now the poem is nearly ready to really begin. (I wonder what it’ll have to say!)
Thanks!
~neil
Neil, I’m glad you worked this for two weeks. The fruit it bears was worth the effort. When I reread several different meanings arise and fit this puzzle together…but the theme of it pulls me through wonderings of god, creation, perspective, memory, and the bear. Oh my, how often bear visits my dreams and I plunge things into furry flesh. Bears get me every time.
I like that there are seven distinct parts and the world was created in seven days. And, I like another example of prose poetry. This is a magnificent colorful stew, worthy of the feast.
~Brenda
Thanks Brenda! The appreciation is mutual. And actually I just checked, twenty days it was for this poem simmering. (yikes!) Considering seven days, I’m not very efficient for just one poem! 🙂
However (he’s getting serious here) taking on this challenge posed – what would you see if all your beliefs were gone, then you came back into experience fresh that way – it’s a worthy thing to consider I think. Just try stepping outside your beliefs for a moment, a day, and see how pervasive they actually are! (but interesting) What if we held beliefs like fingers? Rather than like gospel truth of who imagine ourselves to be? (would that be fun to consider!!) I’m not “bad mouthing” beliefs, but perhaps they don’t belong in the driver’s seat.
Is actual experience something more direct? That’s the bear. I like the bear. (hopefully the bear will have more to say!)
And yea, I also have a passioned interest in prose poems. Especially after reading Stephen Mitchell’s translation of Gilgamesh. (compelling, beautiful, powerful, definitely in a mythic sort of way) Bridges print and voice and story-telling, reveals how and why stories matter to us. I want to do something more along that line but as yet – no clue how. There are things that can only become visible in that manner I think.
Thank you again. ~neil
I read through this. How I wish I could say I was smart enough to understand all the nuances. . But if we were, we would all be mind readers, including the lucid reading of our own minds. Sometimes that is more of a difficult task perhaps. But I’m going back to the first part..what would be without our beliefs? We’d be still , I guess…not a ripple of sadness or even joy for those emotions are all so intricately woven with our beliefs too, aren’t they…so many hundred thousands of them. There would be no room at all, may be. May be it would just dissolve into everything else, someONE, someTHING?…who knows? And the regrets and the pain wouldn’t matter then , because they are there because we are in that room of separateness…our beliefs…What if you are born a bear…may be there is a bit of you in every bear and in every bite it takes..may be there is a bit of every bear in you as well 🙂 Intriguing, uour writing:-)
Thank you dreamingthruthetwilight. Intriguing name!
Yet an infant feels, experiences. What beliefs does an infant hold? I’m not saying don’t have beliefs (like we have much choice anyway), but maybe they were never meant to be like stones? Maybe like falling leaves. How might that be? What if we were awake when we wrote down our beliefs? Might they be less serious? Might they welcome experience more, not try to mold them into images already made? Maybe the world is bigger than belief? Wouldn’t that be interesting!
Thank you again for visiting and taking time to leave such a thoughtful comment too. Much appreciated.
Neil, if this is how you dream, perhaps you should sleep with the prompt writers. You include lists of words and phrases like those I cut and paste into my things-to-write-about file. “Things that live past the moment of their own time,” is a last line of a poem wanting to be written, and there are dozens more. It is a fine line between draft and drafty, but this is a poet’s treasure trove, deserving of a bookmark.
Thank you Mike. Very kind, considerate of you to say.
I think this poem also wants to say, thank you for listening. I know I do and your visit, your comment is much appreciated. Good fortune too for all that awaits you writing it.
Neil , I’m back at the keyboard having been travelling…..but where are you?…….hope you are well and just having a ssummer holiday
Sean
My friend, your shoes are a burning burning rubber! and mine are like glue! I feel accomplished if and when I make the 50 miles to the ocean-side. I am a local boy and you, you are more than only the wonderful Botany Bay fisher-man – so much more indeed! I apologize for my lack of swiftness, but don’t think I haven’t been reading along with your adventures of late. I’m glad for you and your fortuitous friends!
I’ll be a knocking pretty soon to the reams of postcard adventures, a tasty trail of crumbs you’ve left to share with us. Thank you Sean.
Neil, this is how it works. I read this a while back and was stumped. Caught some fleeting glimpses but they didn’t quite hang together, so decided to try another day. Could be me, could be you.
Came back a few days later. Now remembered being stumped and was fighting that as well. All got mixed up together. So gave it up again. And the same thing the next time.
So, now I am here and have carefully read through it again. More glimpses, more solid than before. And I told myself that, okay this is Neil, I believe in Neil so I know there is something here. Something worth finding. And guess what? I did. Found myself stumbling around wondering about beliefs and thoughts, perspectives, and feelings. All mixed up together in that room, this room, where I awakened. The room was the same. But I was not.
And now I think I’m going to write a poem. About The Dead Woman Reading Neil’s First Dead Man Poem.
Thanks Neil,
Elizabeth
Yes children, that’s the sound of hands clapping you hear!
Elizabeth, I am so openly touched by your steadfast willingness, by your faith in me. That’s the part I want to say unwrapped my friend.
Twice weeks to write this thing, and many more than twice, visiting, picking at this or that lint along the way. I wondered much myself. Maybe thus Elizabeth you’ve taken the same literal path to read as I did write?
I rather like that thought.
I sometimes think I mostly understand, but saying that such that anyone other than me also would – that’s a trick because language don’t talk like that, and winds up saying something else. Ain’t easy for me, not yet. But better fall than not try crafting wings (even if I stumble lots).
Looking forward to your poem-in-the-wings!
My thanks to you, Neil
Hi Neil, glad you’re back and glad you’re ok
Sean